Space, science, and the human mind. Since 1995.
Space Daily Editorial Team
Editorial Team

Space Daily Editorial Team

Editorial Team

The Space Daily Editorial Team produces content across our two editorial pillars: space industry news and Mind & Meaning. We cover launches, missions, satellites, defense, and the technology of getting humans to space, alongside the psychology of ambition, isolation, and meaning under extremes. Articles reflect our team's collective editorial process, source verification, drafting, technical review, and editing, rather than a single writer's work. Space Daily takes editorial responsibility for content under this byline. For more on how we work, see our editorial policy.

Science

For 21 years, Voyager 1’s primary roll thrusters were considered dead. Then in 2025, NASA tried to wake them up from 15 billion miles away — knowing that if they fired cold, they could explode, but if they stayed dead, the spacecraft might one day lose its aim at Earth forever.

For most spacecraft, a failed thruster is an engineering problem. For Voyager 1, it is a problem stretched across interstellar space, handled by commands that take more than 23 hours to arrive and another 23 hours to report back.

Aerospace

During NASA’s astronaut selection process, psychologists deliberately interrupt candidates, criticise correct answers, impose impossible time limits, and tell candidates they solved problems wrong when in fact they solved them correctly, in a specific set of interview tactics designed to identify the one psychological trait that determines who becomes an astronaut and who does not

The tactic sounds cruel. It is not. It is, on the accumulated evidence from more than six decades of astronaut selection at NASA, the single most reliable way that the agency has found to identify the specific quality it needs its future astronauts to possess.