On Sunday, 19 July, Spain will play Argentina in the FIFA World Cup final at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, the first men’s World Cup final held on American soil since 1994. Argentina, the holders, reached it by beating England 2-1 in Atlanta on 15 July, with Enzo Fernandez and Lautaro Martinez scoring late. Spain came through a day earlier with a 2-0 win over France in Dallas.
Two claims tend to travel with a match like this: that soccer is the world’s dominant sports market, and that American investors have lately started to treat it that way. Each is broadly true, and each carries qualifications the headline version tends to drop.
What the viewership figures actually say
Begin with audience, because that is where the comparison is usually made and usually mangled. UEFA has estimated the 2025 Champions League final drew an average live global audience of around 145 million, with total reach across television, streaming and public viewing put beyond 430 million. Super Bowl LIX in February 2025 averaged 127.7 million viewers across all platforms, and Nielsen put its total reach, meaning everyone who watched any part, at 191.1 million.
So the Champions League final’s average live audience does exceed the Super Bowl’s, and it reaches more than 200 territories against 180 for the Super Bowl.
On global reach, the gap is real. It widens for the World Cup final: FIFA put the cumulative global audience for the 2022 final at about 1.5 billion, though that figure counts anyone who watched a minute of coverage rather than a simultaneous audience, and it should be read that way.
Domestically the picture inverts. Inside the United States the Super Bowl is not seriously rivalled, and until this year no soccer match came close. The 2022 World Cup final, at 25.8 million American viewers, held the record for the most-watched soccer telecast in US history for almost four years. That record has just fallen: the United States’ round-of-16 loss to Belgium on 6 July drew about 30 million viewers on Fox, more once Spanish-language and streaming audiences are added, and now stands as the most-watched soccer broadcast the country has recorded.
Soccer’s American ceiling has moved.
The money that followed
None of the money rests on a single match. Clubs across Europe’s five biggest leagues generated 20.4 billion euros, about 23.7 billion US dollars, in the 2023-24 season, on Deloitte’s figures as reported by CNBC. In 1996-97, the season the Premier League era was getting under way, the same five leagues brought in 2.5 billion euros. Valuations have climbed with the revenue. Forbes’ 2026 ranking put Real Madrid at 9.5 billion dollars, Barcelona at 7.5 billion and Manchester United at 7.2 billion, with the thirty most valuable clubs worth some 87 billion dollars between them and an average value up 21 per cent on the year.
What is actually new, and what is not
American ownership of European clubs is not a recent development. The Glazer family bought Manchester United in 2005, Fenway Sports Group took over Liverpool in 2010, and Stan Kroenke built his Arsenal stake across the same stretch. What has changed is the type of buyer and the way the club is handled as an asset.
PitchBook’s tracking shows more than 36 per cent of clubs in the Big Five leagues began the 2025-26 season with backing from private equity, venture capital or private debt. Multi-club ownership groups now hold stakes in close to 48 per cent of those clubs, up from 41.7 per cent a year earlier, and US investors account for roughly 40 per cent of the activity. In England the shift has gone furthest, with American investors holding full or partial stakes in a majority of Premier League clubs, including four of the traditional Big Six.
Dealmaking has moved just as fast. PitchBook records merger and acquisition activity in European clubs rising from 66.7 million euros in 2018 to nearly 2.2 billion euros in 2024, and the deals have kept coming. The US firm Apollo Sports Capital completed its purchase of Atlético Madrid in March 2026, a transaction worth around 2.95 billion dollars including debt. The billionaire buying a club as a trophy has not disappeared, but the newer money arrives with return targets, fund timelines and, increasingly, a portfolio of clubs.
Why European clubs, and why now
Some of the appeal is structural. European leagues have promotion and relegation; American franchises do not, and that difference cuts both ways. Relegation risk has helped keep European valuations below those in the closed US leagues. Forbes made the point from the other side this year, noting that Major League Soccer clubs carry high valuation multiples partly because they cannot be relegated, which gives investors more certainty. For a buyer who believes the revenue line keeps climbing, a club exposed to relegation can look like a discount rather than a hazard.
Then there is the tournament itself. Staging it across the United States, Canada and Mexico gives American investors a working demonstration of domestic demand, and the clubs they own in Europe stand to gain from any lasting lift in US interest. Traffic in the other direction is far harder. Two attempts to move regular-season league fixtures abroad both collapsed within months of each other. La Liga’s plan to stage Barcelona against Villarreal in Miami was scrapped in October 2025 after player protests, and Serie A’s plan to play Milan against Como in Perth fell through that December over approval conditions and cost. Clubs and leagues clearly want to sell the domestic game abroad. So far, players and fans have pushed back hard enough to stop them.
What to watch after the final
Growth is showing signs of levelling. Deloitte projects revenue across the top leagues plateauing in the 2025-26 season, with the media-rights income that long drove the business slowing, which is why clubs are leaning harder on sponsorship and on hiring out stadiums for concerts and events. It is not a uniform slowdown. Champions League media rights are reported to be heading for a rise of about 20 per cent in the cycle beginning in 2027, which cuts against the plateau story at the elite end.
There is a regulatory question underneath all of it. UEFA has begun tightening its rules on multi-club ownership, the model a large share of recent American investment depends on. Whether the returns hold, and whether that structure survives contact with the regulator, are the questions the next few seasons will decide. Sunday’s final in New Jersey is the clearest evidence yet that the American market has arrived. What happens to the money already inside European soccer will be settled elsewhere: in UEFA’s review of those ownership rules, and in whether the richer 2027 rights deal proves the last big uplift or the next one.