Food and Agriculture Organization officials attending a meat congress in Buenos Aires warned the world faced a developing crisis in beef production as global human population would soon outstrip the numbers that current or future supplies from livestock farming could feed.

Henning Steinfeld, coordinator of livestock, environment and development initiative at the FAO, warned delegates beef could become so scarce as to be equated with caviar, in the same way as salmon was a luxury food item half a century ago.

The news was greeted with mixed reactions from Argentina’s beef farmers. Analysts said the FAO pronouncement could be interpreted differently by various vested interests and would likely be exploited as a pretext for price inflation.

Meat producers and exporters at the 18th World Meat Congress said global trends indicated the markets would continue to be buoyant while supplies remained limited not only for beef but also for lamb and other white meat.

Steinfeld’s comments appeared to echo statements by World Wildlife Fund’s livestock expert Bryan Weech, who said farmers already faced costs that made beef production uneconomical.

Sustainable resources for livestock production were among challenges the world community would face as human population reached new highs, delegates said.

Steinfeld said beef will become an extreme luxury food item worldwide by 2050 because of soaring production costs.

“The necessary resources for the production of beef will be three, four, five times higher than those of chicken and pork,” said Steinfeld.

Citing projections for the coming decades he said beef could cease to be a “mass product” since beef production couldn’t sustain the growth of world population.

He cited estimates that world population would reach 9 billion by 2050 — about 3 billion more than at present — while projected growth in beef consumption would double in the next four decades.

Steinfeld indicated the projection meant the increase in consumption would likely coincide with a steep rise in prices of beef, making it a food product exclusively for the privileged and the rich.

Delegates said the beef industry already faced a crisis because current prices didn’t cover production costs.

Weech argued the prices failed to cover the costs of water used for the maintenance and care of cattle, a disincentive for investors.

Delegates argued the industry needed to enhance its application of new technologies, including further research into improved genetics and use of less land and resources for greater livestock production.

earlier related report

Sinochem struggles to mount rival Potash bid: reportHong Kong (AFP) Sept 30, 2010 –
China’s Sinochem Group is struggling to mount a rival offer to thwart BHP Billiton’s hostile 40 billion US dollar hostile takeover bid for Canada’s Potash Corp, a report said Thursday.

The state-owned company is having trouble finding a partner to make an offer for Potash, the world’s biggest fertiliser maker, after talks broke down with Russian fertiliser group UralKali, the Financial Times said.

Sinochem had made earlier approaches to a Canadian public pension fund and Singapore sovereign wealth fund Temasek, the paper said, as the firm looks to soothe fears in Ottawa about Potash being sold to a Chinese state company.

Sinochem had also asked the Chinese government to back a potential bid, local media has reported.

The group — China’s top fertiliser maker — did not have sufficient funds to make the bid on its own, and would need to team up with another firm, reports have said.

China, a major importer of potash which is used to make fertiliser, has been uneasy about the BHP bid as it already buys large quantities of the company’s iron ore.

Potash filed a lawsuit last week aimed at stopping the hostile takeover by the Anglo-Australian mining giant, saying its bid was built on “false and misleading statements and omissions.” It had earlier described the 130 dollar per share all-cash offer as “wholly inadequate.”

BHP dismissed the lawsuit as “entirely without merit”, adding that the firm “will contest it vigorously.”