 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
 By Glenn CHAPMAN San Francisco (AFP) Aug 20, 2020
Uber and rideshare rival Lyft on Thursday backed away from plans to halt service in California after an appeals court granted them a temporary reprieve from having to reclassify drivers as employees. A judge had originally given Uber and Lyft until Friday to comply with a labor law on the matter, which went into effect at the start of this year. "The petitions are granted and the preliminary injunction is stayed pending resolution of Lyft and Uber appeals," the appeals court said in its ruling. The court said it wants sworn statements from Uber and Lyft that they would comply if the judge's original order is eventually upheld and if a proposition aimed at overriding the new labor law loses on a November ballot. It also set an October 13 hearing date for oral arguments on the matter. A ballot measure sponsored by the companies would keep drivers classified as contractors but provide benefits such as health care. "We are glad that the Court of Appeals recognized the important questions raised in this case," Uber said. "And that access to these critical services won't be cut off while we continue to advocate for drivers' ability to work with the freedom they want." Shortly before the appeals court decision, Lyft said it would suspend its rideshare service in California rather than classify drivers as employees entitled to benefits. "This change would... necessitate an overhaul of the entire business model -- it's not a switch that can be flipped overnight," Lyft said in a blog post. Uber had also been expected to suspend ride service in California. The legal clash in the most populous US state marks an escalation in the yearslong battle between authorities and start-ups that have changed the way people work and live. A suit filed by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and three cities, including San Francisco, calls on the two rideshare companies to comply with a law requiring "gig workers" be made employees who are eligible for unemployment, medical and other benefits. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said in a note to investors that the appeals court ruling "temporarily removes a major black cloud" hanging over rideshare firms. - 'Shameful' avoidance of law - The Teamsters labor group attacked the idea of Lyft and Uber opting to suspend ride service in California, saying: "It's shameful there are companies that would rather cease operations altogether than abide by labor laws." Uber and Lyft are counting on voters to approve a ballot measure sponsored by the companies that would keep drivers classified as contractors but provide benefits such as health care. Analysts cautioned California regulators against the risk of putting more people out of work as American unemployment has spiked amid the coronavirus pandemic. "California is trying to do the right thing, but this is the wrong time for it," said technology analyst Rob Enderle of Enderle Group. "This is not a time when you want to knock a whole lot of people out of work, which is the danger here." If forced to abide by the labor law, a backup plan for Uber would be to shift to "a much smaller service, much higher prices" according to chief executive Dara Khosrowshahi. Uber is also reported to be exploring the feasibility of franchising its ride service. "In a nutshell, implementation and enforcement of AB5 (the new law) is challenging and a major gut punch to the gig economy's future growth prospects," Ives said. The threat to its business puts pressure on Uber to move faster toward its vision of dispatching self-driving cars to provide rides on demand, according to analyst Enderle. gc/bfm
Uber-Lyft to stop California services absent reprieve San Francisco (AFP) Aug 19, 2020 Uber and Lyft are hoping a courtroom reprieve will spare them from shutting down their rival smartphone-summoned ride services in California on Friday. The companies are awaiting word from an appeals court whether they will be able to delay having to abide by a new state law that officials argue requires them to reclassify drivers as employees entitled to worker benefits. A judge gave them until the end of Thursday to make the change, which both companies argue is too complex and costly to do qu ... read more
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Google
