. | . |
US case filed against Boeing over MH370 disappearance by Staff Writers Kuala Lumpur (AFP) March 8, 2016 The family of an MH370 passenger has brought a lawsuit against Boeing in what is believed to be the first case filed in the United States against the manufacturer of the missing plane. The suit was filed last week in Chicago, where Boeing is headquartered, on behalf of MH370 passenger and US citizen Philip Wood. It alleges that the Boeing 777 aircraft flown by Malaysia Airlines was a defective product and seeks court-determined compensation, according to a copy of the complaint. Tuesday marks exactly two years since the flight vanished en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 239 passengers and crew. Authorities believe it veered out over the remote southern Indian Ocean, where it went down, but no crash site has been found and the cause of the tragedy remains unknown. The second anniversary is the deadline for legal action against the airline, and lawsuits have been filed in recent days on behalf of well over 100 next-of-kin in courts in the United States, Malaysia, China, Australia, and elsewhere. The Boeing suit said the flight's disappearance was due in part to the aircraft's lack of "readily available and reasonable alternative technologies that would have permitted the Boeing airplane's precise location to be tracked in real-time anywhere on the planet." It also said the failure so far to find a crash site indicated Boeing had equipped the jet's black boxes with "ineffectual" underwater locator beacons, and that the lack of evidence pointing to any non-mechanical cause indicates an aircraft problem. "A reasonable inference that can be drawn from all of the available evidence is that the disappearance of flight MH370 was the result of one or more defects in the manufacture and or design of the Boeing airplane," said the complaint.
Malaysia, Australia still 'hopeful' on MH370 anniversary The anniversary will be marked in Malaysia with the release of a progress report by investigators probing the baffling case, but it remained unclear whether it would contain any new revelations. Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said authorities conducting a painstaking and still-fruitless search for a crash site in the Indian Ocean remain committed to solving the "agonising mystery". "The current search operation is expected to be completed later this year, and we remain hopeful that MH370 will be found," he said in a statement. If the search fails, Malaysia, Australia and China will meet "to determine the way forward," he added. The Malaysia Airlines jet vanished on March 8, 2014 en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 239 passengers and crew onboard, mostly from China and Malaysia. Authorities believe it flew far out over the remote southern Indian Ocean and went down. The three nations have already indicated they will end the biggest and most expensive search effort in history if nothing is found on the seafloor in the designated search area. That zone is expected to be fully scoured within a few months. Next-of-kin, struggling for closure in the tragedy, have pleaded for the quest to continue beyond that. Australian Transport Minister Darren Chester also said Tuesday that the three countries remain "hopeful". "Finding the aircraft would give answers to the world, in particular the families of missing loved ones, about what happened," he said. - Investigators to issue statement - The team of international investigators set up in the wake of the disappearance will issue its progress report at 3:00 pm (0700 GMT). The update is required under international rules regardless of whether there is anything new to report. The team's initial report, issued a year ago on the first anniversary, shed no light on the perplexing mystery. Theories to explain the disappearance include a possible mechanical or structural failure, a hijacking or terror plot, or rogue pilot action. Malaysia's parliament observed a minute's silence for the anniversary but there were otherwise no major public events in the country. In Beijing, at least 20 Chinese relatives of those on board gathered at a major Buddhist temple to pray and shout slogans such as "Malaysia, return our loved ones!" under the watchful eyes of scores of police. Several fell to their knees and bent their heads to the ground in prayer, burning joss sticks in their hands. Many families accuse the airline and Malaysian government of letting the plane slip away through a bungled response, withholding information on what happened, and treating grieving relatives insensitively. The second anniversary also is the deadline for filing lawsuits against the airline. Scores and perhaps hundreds of next-of-kin have filed lawsuits seeking damages in recent days in the United States, Malaysia, China, Australia and elsewhere, while others have accepted undisclosed settlements, say attorneys. The flag carrier on Tuesday denied the charge of insensitivity toward next-of-kin and promised to honour its "moral and legal obligations." "(Malaysia Airlines) has never shied away from its commitment to engage with the next-of-kin, and strives in good faith for payment of fair and equitable compensation," it said in a statement to AFP. A wing fragment which was later confirmed to be from MH370 was found on an island thousands of kilometres from the search area last July, the first proof the plane went down. Two new pieces of debris have been found recently. But they are yet to be confirmed as from the aircraft and such flotsam is anyway no help in pinpointing a crash site.
Related Links Aerospace News at SpaceMart.com
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |