. 24/7 Space News .
US Slipping In Stem Cells

In 2005, the government doubled funding of stem cell research to $175 million and has projects planned including a national stem cell bank, and centers of excellence to promote cutting-edge research.
by Olga Pierce
UPI Health Business Correspondent
Washington (UPI) Oct 25, 2006
The legal restrictions on U.S. stem cell research limit the avenues that scientists can pursue, experts said this week. Those against the restrictions say they are putting American researchers at a disadvantage compared to their counterparts in other countries. But those in favor say they impose reasonable limits -- and may be nudging the research in the right direction.

"We know how to spur biomedical research in this country -- we're just not doing it," said Michael Werner, president of the Werner Group, a biomedical research firm, at a panel at the liberal Center for American Progress Wednesday. "The (United States) is not going to be a leader in embryonic stem cell research until that changes."

Many researchers and others believe that research into stem cells holds the promise of new cures for health problems like spinal cord injuries, muscle damage and cancer. Stem cells can be harvested from several sources, including the bone marrow of adults but a prime source of the cells is human embryos.

In 2001, President Bush interpreted language in the bill funding the National Institutes of Health banning the destruction of embryos in federally funded research to mean that the government will only pay for research on one of 21 stem cell lines already in existence.

Since then, researchers have been forced to navigate a hodgepodge of state laws and funding sources. The extra burden may be taking its toll. A recent study by researchers at Stanford University and the University of Michigan found that between 2002 and 2004, the proportion of scholarly articles on stem cell research published by American research teams fell from one-third to one-fourth.

Part of the cause of the relative slowdown is that in other countries with a clearer regulatory framework, researchers do not have to struggle with confusing regulations and uncertain funding, panelists said.

In the United Kingdom, a single body -- the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) -- is charged with coordinating the country's governmental stem cell efforts. At the core is a 1990 parliamentary law which specifically allows for the creation and use of human embryos for research. The authority is charged with updating the law to keep abreast of scientific developments.

The law specifically outlines where embryos can come from and for what purposes they can be used, Angela McNabb, chief executive of the HFEA, said at the panel.

"There is value and respect due to an embryo," she said. "If there are alternatives available, we want researchers to use them."

The fact that the authority's jurisdiction was the result of a parliamentary debate also aided in the public's understanding of stem cell research, she said. "Talk about it. The more you tell people, the less they worry about it, and acceptance follows."

That strategy will have a large payoff next year when the law is up for review, McNabb told United Press International.

"Nobody's going to re-debate (whether) we should allow stem cell research," she said. "The whole regulatory framework is not up for grabs. The (country) believes it's worked well."

In 2005, the government doubled funding of stem cell research to $175 million and has projects planned including a national stem cell bank, and centers of excellence to promote cutting-edge research.

The presence of the HFEA means extra paperwork, said Alison Murdoch, a professor of reproductive medicine who operates a fertility clinic in England, but also means added security, because it clearly spells out the rights of patients and acceptable research practices.

The clinic, which uses embryos leftover from fertility treatments for stem cell research, employs a full-time research nurse whose job it is to discuss the potential research uses of embryos for patients. After several conversations, patients who choose to participate are asked to sign a written consent form.

"The regulatory framework overall is actually in my benefit and to benefits of patients," Murdoch said.

In the United States, researchers must be very careful to make sure their stem cell research efforts are in compliance with state and federal laws, said Joanne Carney, director of the Center for Science, Technology and Congress at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, an consortium of scientists' groups which publishes the journal Science.

To make sure no federal funding is used for stem cell research, research institutions must build separate facilities, purchase separate equipment and carefully track staff time, Carney told UPI.

"They have to have very large separations in resources. It makes it very complicated," she said. "The absence of a national policy that allows more flexible access to stem cells is making it more difficult to progress. The research community would have preferred a policy that would have allowed them to do research on stem cell lines regardless of when they had arrived."

American scientists are currently participating in efforts to create global guidelines for the research, but change is unlikely before the 2008 presidential election, she said.

In the meantime, scientists are still managing to do good research in the United States, she added, "The (United States) is still very competitive in this field."

But others feel the current restrictions are not out of line.

"The federal government puts money into stem cell research every year," Matthew Eppinette, assistant director of the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity, told UPI. "There's never going to be an unlimited number of stem cell lines, and unlimited money."

Given the deep cultural divide regarding the research, it may be more appropriate for scientists to seek available funding in the private sector or from states, which have committed tens of millions of dollars in the past decade.

"Are they just rejecting the idea of limits at all?" he asked. "There's a deep divide in our country."

The limits also place greater emphasis on research using adult stem cells, which -- so far -- has been more successful in creating actual medical treatments, Eppinette said. "Let's put our energy into an area without a huge debate that is already finding ways to heal people."

Source: United Press International

Related Links
Stem Cell News And Information



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


New Stem Cell Method Questioned
Washington (UPI) Sep 11, 2006
Advanced Cell Technology's technique for harvesting embryonic stem cells without harming embryos first reported two weeks ago continues to be enveloped in controversy because scientists say more research is needed to show the method is safe for embryos.







  • Space Radiation Threats To Astronauts Addressed In Federal Research Study
  • NASA, Lock-Mart, Boeing to Speak at Phoenix Integration System of Systems Workshop
  • Retrofuture Products Launches Space Food Sticks
  • Firing Room 1 Gets A New Look

  • 1000 Sols On Mars
  • ESA To Take Part In Russian Mars Experiment
  • Study Fuels Debate Of Life On Mars
  • Preparations Continue For Manned Expedition To Mars One Day

  • Russian Space Co. To Launch At Least 11 Satellites By 2009
  • ATK Receives $17.5 Million Contract For CASTOR 120-R Motors
  • MetOp Weather Satellite Reaches Polar Orbit
  • European Weather Satellite Pencilled For New Launch Bid

  • Start of Operations Phase For ALOS And Data Provision To The Public
  • Afghanistan Opium Cultivation Monitored By International DMC Constellation
  • Deimos And Surrey Satellite Technology Contract For Spanish Imaging Mission
  • NASA Satellite Data Helps Assess the Health of Florida's Coral Reef

  • Scientist Who Found Tenth Planet Discusses The Downgrading Of Pluto
  • New Horizons Spacecraft Snaps Approach Image of the Giant Planet
  • Does The Atmosphere Of Pluto Go Through The Fast-Freeze
  • Changing Seasons On The Road Trip To Planet Nine

  • Star Ends Infancy Abruptly
  • Hubble Yields Direct Proof Of Stellar Sorting In A Globular Cluster
  • Busted! Astronomers Nab Culprit In Galactic Hit-and-Run
  • Antennae Galaxies Make For A Fertile Marriage In Stellar Chemistry Writ Large

  • No Lunar Polar Ice Sheets Found In High Resolution Radar Images
  • New Russian Spaceship Will Be Able To Fly To Moon - Space Corp
  • Ice Store At Moon's South Pole Is A Myth
  • In Space Everyone Can Hear You Misspeak

  • India May Quit EU-led GPS project
  • EU Refuses To Rule Out Military Role For Galileo GPS Network
  • Boeing Delivers Hardware And Completes Software Testing For GPS
  • Flies In A Spider Web: Galaxy Caught In The Making

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement