Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. 24/7 Space News .




SUPERPOWERS
Outside View: How much is enough -- Part 2
by Harlan Ullman
Washington (UPI) Aug 29, 2012


Obama to play up national security record at party meet
Washington (AFP) Aug 29, 2012 - The Democratic Party will play up what it sees as President Barack Obama's shining national security credentials at its party convention next week, aides to the president said Wednesday.

The party will "highlight the significant role President Obama's strong record on national security and veterans issues" during the convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, which runs from next Tuesday to Thursday, said Adam Fletcher, a campaign spokesman.

Fletcher cited Obama accomplishments such as "ending the war in Iraq responsibly, to refocusing on al-Qaeda and decimating its leadership, to taking care of our men and women in uniform when they return home."

He said these themes would be touched on throughout the week but especially on its last evening Thursday in an address by Senator John Kerry, a former presidential candidate and foreign policy heavyweight.

A Vietnam veteran who lost to George W. Bush in 2004, Kerry is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee.

Kerry has been mentioned often as a possible successor to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton if Obama defeats Republican challenger Mitt Romney in the November 6 election.

Given that the United States' latest defense strategy was crafted earlier this year accounting for a nearly $490 billion defense cut over the next 10 years, if the Pentagon were to undertake a new strategic review, how might it go about accomplishing one, assuming the huge initial resistance against such an effort could be overcome?

First, in the shadow of this resistance and sequestration that, left unchecked by Congress cuts a further $500 billion from defense over the next decade, soon after the election, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the four-star commanders should set aside ample time to examine the historical record of where and how U.S. military force worked; where it didn't; and where and why it simply failed. The purpose is to understand with clarity the limits of military force as guidelines for future capability.

Second, in addition to its current plans, given that annual defense spending in peacetime in current dollars has averaged about $400 billion-450 billion, three additional budget options should be assessed as the basis for future military posture: a ceiling of $600 billion which assumes that the additional $500 billion of sequestration cuts are made, although rationally and not "equally" across all programs; $400 billion-450 billion; and a floor of $350 billion.

Third, given that the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy are pursuing an "air-sea" campaign based on the shift to Asia and the U.S. Army and the U.S. Marine Corps are defining their needs for forward, prepositioned equipment in that region, these various and probably competing plans must be integrated and reconciled into a coherent strategic concept to prevent costly inefficiencies of separate and possibly redundant thinking to take hold.

Regarding the first point, this is what such a historical summary might uncover. The United States succeeded in World War II for many reasons, most self-evident. These reasons, from a fully united nation to the contribution of allies who stood fast and bled the Wehrmacht to death on the Eastern Front must be understood and digested.

In Korea, we could have succeeded if the president and the Joint Chiefs had reined in the vanity and ego of Gen. Douglas MacArthur and not him allowed to proceed so recklessly toward the Yalu River ignoring the obvious signs of Chinese intervention.

Vietnam was a disaster. We engaged for wrong-headed ideological reasons based on the false premise of a global communist threat uniting Moscow and Beijing. In fact, both countries were at each other's throats. We followed a massively misplaced strategy of search and destroy in which body counts were the metric of success, winning nearly every battle and yet losing the war.

In Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, the objectives stated by President George H.W. Bush were crystal clear. Throw Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait and, in the process, defang the Iraqi military in what would become a 100-hour ground campaign. The Bush administration knew that occupying Iraq was a non-starter, sadly something his son failed to repeat a decade later. And the survival of Saddam, however evil, was a counter-weight to Iran.

Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom were tactical successes and strategic calamities. In late 2001, the Taliban were overthrown in a matter of days. Then the George W. Bush White House turned its attention to its real target -- Iraq and the misguided idea that through regime change, not only Iraq but the greater Middle

East would be irreversibly set on a path to democracy. Sadly, that didn't happen.

The conclusions for national security policy objectives and the types and levels of military forces that are needed to defend the nation are unambiguous.

First, strategic aims that are obtainable, perfectly clear and as non-ideological as possible must be set.

Second, military force is most effective in defeating military force. In today's ambiguous world where threats such as al-Qaida and other radical groups that have no armies or navies of their own, means beyond military force are essential for success. That does not imply that Special Forces, drones and other military capability cannot be helpful. They aren't sufficient alone for success.

Third, the Pentagon must begin confronting perhaps its greatest bureaucratic and cultural challenge. After more than a decade of unprecedented defense increases along with the stimulus of OCO -- Overseas Contingency Operations -- no one in the Pentagon at senior levels has any experience in or has prepared for downsizing. Ignoring this reality will make downsizing far more difficult if not impossible.

Will any of the above happen? Probably not. The Pentagon will hope for the best and avoid planning for the worst until it is too late. Until the election, that makes political sense. But the day after the election, someone better be looking at Plans B-Z just in case.

(Harlan Ullman is chairman of the Killowen Group, which advises leaders of government and business, and senior adviser at Washington's Atlantic Council. This is the second of several columns on defense.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

.


Related Links
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle








SUPERPOWERS
Japan looks to buy disputed Senkakus
Tokyo (UPI) Aug 28, 2012
Japan's government is hoping to buy the private Senkaku Islands to bolster the country's claim to ownership in the face of increasing Chinese counter-claims. The central Japanese government has been leasing four of the five islands from the Kurihara family for many years. Landings are by government permission only and rarely granted, Kyodo News Agency reported. But the government ... read more


SUPERPOWERS
Apollo 11 capsule stirs Neil Armstrong memories, tributes

Signing out: Armstrong autographs under hammer

Tributes pour in for 'man on the moon' Armstrong

Neil Armstrong: First man on the moon

SUPERPOWERS
Curiosity In It for the Long Haul

NASA's Mars rover heads east, driving 'beautifully'

NASA likens Mars rover to Armstrong lunar landmark

Chemcam Laser First Analyzes Yield Beautiful Results

SUPERPOWERS
Manned interplanetary missions on NASA's agenda

Space race, on a budget, was not how Armstrong saw it

Research and Technology Studies 2012

Singer Sarah Brightman could be next space tourist: report

SUPERPOWERS
China eyes next lunar landing as US scales back

China unveils ambitious space projects

Is China Going to Blast Past America in Space?

Hong Kong people share joy of China's manned space program

SUPERPOWERS
Dragon Spacecraft Set to Make Second Run for ISS

Europe's ATV-3 Space Freighter Raises ISS Orbit to 420 km

Russia's ISS Crew Members Complete Spacewalk

Sierra Nevada Supports Communications Experiment on ISS

SUPERPOWERS
NASA Administrator Announces New Commercial Crew And Cargo Milestones

Ariane 5s are on the move for Arianespace's upcoming missions

Readying the "boost" for Galileo satellites on Arianespace's next Soyuz mission at the Space

ASTRA 2F touches down in French Guiana for Arianespace's next Ariane 5 dual-passenger mission

SUPERPOWERS
Search for alien life gets boost at twin star

First Evidence Discovered of Planet's Destruction by Its Star

Exoplanet hosting stars give further insights on planet formation

Five Potential Habitable Exoplanets Now

SUPERPOWERS
Modern lives in US are multi-screen: Google

Weighing molecules one at a time

Brazil bids to become world's third IT market by 2022

The Laser Beam as a "3D Painter"




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement