|
. | . |
|
by Martin Sieff Washington (UPI) Jul 17, 2008
The United States is committed, under Article 5 of the 1949 Washington Treaty, to defend its European NATO allies, including Poland, from any foreign aggression. But Poland's current leaders aren't eager to do their part in protecting the United States from thermonuclear attack. The Bush administration wanted to deploy at least 10 Ground Based Interceptors in Central Europe capable of shooting down any future Iranian intercontinental ballistic missiles that might be fired with nuclear warheads against American cities. The previous, pro-American Polish government of Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski was all in favor of the idea, but it was voted out in general elections held late last year, and new Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and his Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski have put greater priority on repairing relations with Russia. They have been dragging their feet in the negotiations with Washington and have upped their demands as the price for housing the interceptor base, to be built by Boeing. Some of the Polish demands are reasonable: Since Russia has threatened to target the base -- and probably other Polish facilities or cities -- if Warsaw allows it to be built, it certainly would make sense for the United States to deploy, or equip the Polish armed forces, with Patriot PAC-3 interceptors that could shoot down the intermediate- and short-range ballistic missiles that Russia might deploy. But the Poles are also holding out for more than $1 billion per year in extra military and foreign aid -- a sum comparable to what the United States gives Egypt and Pakistan to keep them stable and out of the control of extreme Islamists. However, Poland is neither an impoverished Third World nation nor is it in the least danger, obviously, of going radical Muslim. And the Bush administration, facing an economic crisis at home and a Democrat-controlled Congress that this year slashed funding for the Central European GBI deployment plan by one-third, is in no condition to push through anything like the aid levels that Tusk and Sikorski have demanded. Ironically, Sikorski was a longtime Washington resident at the American Enterprise Institute and also ran the New Atlantic Initiative, where he was famous for urging the United States to expand NATO into Central and Eastern Europe to protect Poland and its neighbors, even if this dangerously strained U.S. relations with Russia -- which it did. But when it now comes to approving Polish-based U.S. missile installations to protect the American people, his enthusiasm has vanished. The negotiations to put the base in Poland are not quite dead yet. The Polish newspaper Dziennik reported this week that U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates met Monday to assess the current state of the talks. However, Tusk, Sikorski and his colleagues appear determined to play for time in the talks until Bush leaves office, when their expectation is that Obama will do the dirty work of canceling the base plans for them, even though that decision may leave Washington, Boston, Philadelphia and New York City vulnerable to future Iranian nuclear attack. The Tusk-Sikorski policy is currently popular in Poland, where support for the United States has been waning and fears of angering Russia have been growing. But it could backfire disastrously in the future. It is very possible that an Obama administration, or a subsequent one that takes office in 2012, will want to pull its remaining military forces out of Europe as well as the Middle East. Since the end of the Cold War, U.S. troop levels in Western Europe have fallen from 300,000 to 50,000, and they are widely expected to fall further. A Polish government that has agreed to house crucial U.S. missile defense installations will have an excellent chance of getting future U.S. administrations to continue protecting Poland in a dangerous world. A Polish government that is on record as having refused to host a BMD base critical to protecting tens of millions of American lives will not.
related report "We're waiting for a response from Washington at the highest level, the schedule for further talks in the working groups depends on that," Poland's foreign ministry spokesman Piotr Paszkowski told AFP Friday. Warsaw has been lobbying Washington to provide a Patriot-type air defense system in exchange for a Polish green light for hosting the controversial US missile shield, a project endorsed by NATO but vehemently opposed by Russia. The spokesman confirmed Warsaw was still expecting the response on the "sum of our demands -- an important element is the permanent stationing of Patriots," he said. The United States wants to base 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and a radar facility in the neighbouring Czech Republic by 2011-13 to ward off potential attacks by so-called "rogue" states, notably Iran. The shield would complete a broader US system already in place in the United States, Greenland and Britain. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice sealed the main radar agreement with Czech Republic on July 8, but the Czech parliament must still give the project a final green light. Paszkowski's comments came on the heels of a Friday Polish newspaper report citing unnamed Polish government sources detailing the state of negotiations. "The last information regarding the negotiations was an email on Wednesday several lines long to (Foreign Minister) Radek Sikorski," according to Poland's centrist Dziennik daily. "It was from Daniel Fried, the US undersecretary of state for political affairs. He wrote that his boss Condoleezza Rice had lunch with Defence Secretary Bill Gates. The outcome of the lunch is unknown. No other email has arrived. It could be decisive," says the Dziennik report. Washington's talks with Warsaw have been grinding on since May 2007. After July 10 telephone talks with US Vice President Dick Cheney, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said last week Warsaw was sticking to its demands for a permanent US air defence presence guaranteeing Poland's security. "We can agree anytime, tomorrow, in a week, in a month, as long as we have real guarantees for our security," he said. The conversation between Tusk and Cheney took place after a senior US State Department official who asked not to be named told AFP that a "tentative agreement" had been reached between the US and Poland on missile defence.
Related Links Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement |