. 24/7 Space News .
Lunar Ice Might have Changed Apollo's Legacy
by Frank Sietzen "SpaceCast News Service"
Washington, DC March 9, 1998 - If water ice exists on the Moon in the quantities that scientists predicted last week, the history of space exploration since 1972 might well have been different. The U.S. congress, prodded by a disinterested and apathetic U.S. public then critical of technology and weary of the so-called "high" cost of space exploration, terminated the Apollo lunar landing project in December, 1972.

But two landings were still in the planning stage, and a series of advanced missions under design in two follow-on programs called Apollo Applications and Apollo Extension System. The AAP earth orbital segment survived but only to the extent of a single, prototype space station eventually named Skylab. The lunar segment of AAP plus the extension project were cancelled. The high cost of space exploration was a prime reason.

But some NASA officials now openly speculate that had scientists knew then about the existence of lunar ice, lunar exploration might have continued. "It (the ice discovery) might have changed the direction of the lunar program, " said NASA's Lew Peach.

Peach, the head of advanced space programs for the civil space agency, said last week that use of local resources could drastically reduce the cost of both mounting extended missions on the moon as well as the logistical nightmare of resupply.

Others echoed the same sentiment. "This is a significant resource that will enable a modest amount of colonization for centuries," said Dr. William Feldman, head of the spectrographic research team for the Lunar Prospector project last Thursday at Ames Research Center in California. And what does it mean to living on the moon again, perhaps for extended periods? "What does it mean - it means we can expand to the moon, " said Prospector science chief Dr. Alan Binder.

"We could sustain several thousand people for several hundred years." But don't go asking for a lunar ticket just yet, though Binder said last week given the right kind of national will a return to humans on the moon could take under a decade. At present, neither the U.S. nor Russia has a heavy lift launch vehicle in the Saturn V class that could lift large payloads to the moon. The Saturn V was abandoned by the U.S. in favor of the space shuttle 25 years ago.

The Russian Energyia was also abandoned by the Russian government, although reconstruction of the Energyia assembly lines might be possible. The booster flew but twice, however, and failed to insert one payload on its maiden flight. The second mission carried the Buran shuttle.

No manned spacecraft now exists that can withstand the radiation from the Van Allen belts, through which a craft must traverse to make it to the moon. And most importantly the U.S. Clinton administration and congress as well has shown little interest in manned flights beyond the space station program.

About all the tremendous Prospector find might trigger is an increase in robotic missions to the moon, which will have to be inserted into a tight budget environment that includes deep space exploration to Europa, a Interometry research mission, a Planet Finder, and of course Mars sample returns. "Is this the beginning of a Moon Rush?", asked NSS chief Pat Dasch.

"We expect possibly yes, but in ways that we might not have envisioned when the NSS began its 'Return to the Moon' campaign five years ago," Dasch added. Who will do the rushing, though, remains more a matter of politics than technology -just as it was in May, 1961, when President John F Kennedy started the most recent 'Moon Rush'. Of course, there is always the commercial space sector.

  • SpaceCast Lunar Ice Special Report


    Thanks for being here;
    We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

    With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

    Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

    If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
    SpaceDaily Contributor
    $5 Billed Once


    credit card or paypal
    SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
    $5 Billed Monthly


    paypal only














  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.