Procuring science at the speed we need at the AFRL

Hot off the release of the new Science and Technology 2030 report, the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) is already making strides in improving its processes for managing research among its higher education and industry partners.

The Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) - the basic research office of AFRL and a strong participant in its relationships with universities - jumped into action by implementing a plan for cutting its average grant award time nearly in half.

Maj General Cooley has expressed his excitement for this initiative, even calling it "great progress."

Col David Winebrener, AFOSR Acting Director, explains that this initiative formed in response to external feedback regarding late awards and internal frustrations with cumbersome acquisitions and business processes.

For nearly two years, AFOSR took a hard look at its process for awarding basic research grants using Six Sigma, a methodology of Continuous Process Improvement (CPI). CPI increases operational capabilities, agility, effectiveness and efficiency by applying proven techniques to all processes associated with fulfilling the Air Force mission.

Col Winebrener explains that the team agreed it was important to develop not just faster, but also cost-effective and risk-acceptable reforms for optimizing the grant award process

Key principles of Air Force CPI include improving flow and reducing waste within a process focusing on factors that degrade quality and effectiveness, identifying and overcoming process constraints and redesigning processes.

A team of experts from across AFOSR documented the end-to-end current state of the grant award process, determined the root cause for the main pain points and identified possible countermeasures. They found major time savings could be realized by realigning the grant award process with the Federal Acquisitions Regulations rather than the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations, which could remove as many as 50 days from the combined proposal documentation review and confirmation negotiation stages of the process.

The team also identified delays caused by incomplete or inaccurate proposal cost and technical evaluations and proposed adding and training more quality assurance staff to review.

AFOSR began implementing the team's recommendations in January 2019, and incorporated additional measures into the early discussions for creating AFRL's new business management tool, Pega Systems.

Beginning with the 2019 open Broad Agency Announcement, posted on April 10, 2019, the new process for streamlined grant awards is in full effect. The goal is to increase the speed by which the Air Force procures the knowledge and science it needs to advance warfighting technology and develop innovative capabilities.

+ AFRL Grant Opportunity

Related Links
Air Force Research Laboratory
Military Space News at SpaceWar.com

Tweet

Thanks for being there;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.

SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5+ Billed Monthly

paypal only

SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once

credit card or paypal

Offensive War in Space
Bethesda, MD (SPX) Jun 12, 2019
A new arms race is unfolding among spacefaring nations. Space experts have been telling us about contested space for the last several years. Today, there are about 1,300 active satellites in a crowded nest of Earth orbits. They provide worldwide communications, GPS navigation, weather forecasting and planetary surveillance. Military organizations rely on many of these satellites in support of modern warfare. The three main contenders are the U.S., China and Russia. The ongoing power struggle may i ... read more