. | . |
NATO head backs stronger European defence by Staff Writers Rome (AFP) Oct 14, 2016
NATO head Jens Stoltenberg welcomed Friday European efforts for a more closely integrated defence policy, boosted since Britain's vote to leave the EU, but warned against trying to create "an alternative" to the North Atlantic Alliance. "Stronger European defence will be good for the European Union, it will be good for Europe and will be good for NATO," he said at a press conference with Italian foreign minister Paolo Gentiloni in Rome. Stoltenberg said enhanced cooperation between European nations could only be positive and urged countries to increase defence spending because "we live in a more dangerous world with new challenges and new threats and we have to respond and adapt". But he said "we must make sure to avoid duplication with NATO structures and that what Europe does is complementary to NATO". "I'm very much assured by the strong statements from minister Gentiloni and many other European leaders that this is not about establishing something that is an alternative to NATO," he added. While EU defence ministers have held talks in recent months to discuss ways of boosting defence cooperation, the move has angered Britain which has vowed to oppose any attempt to create an "EU army" following the Brexit vote. The challenges facing NATO and the EU include "an increasingly assertive and unpredictable Russia". "In recent weeks, Russia has deployed missile systems closer to Alliance borders that could carry nuclear warheads... We will continue pursuing our policy of strong defence combined with political dialogue." Minister Gentiloni said Italy would play a part in a move to counter Russian war games in areas bordering NATO Baltic states since the start of the Ukraine crisis, sending 140 men to join other battalions in bolstering the alliance's eastern flank. The news sparked an outcry from Italy's left wing and the anti-establishment Five Star Movement (M5S), which slammed "a move which risks exposing our country to war-like scenes and puts us back 30 years."
NATO and Russia's influence dominate Montenegro vote Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic, who led the small Adriatic republic to independence from Serbia in 2006, has steered the nation towards closer ties with the West, pursuing membership in both the European Union and NATO. But Djukanovic is up against groups who oppose joining the military alliance, an issue that deeply divides the country, and analysts say he may fail to win enough support to form a stable government. Montenegro's recent invitation to join NATO -- yet to be ratified by Podgorica as well as other member states -- follows other decisions that have displeased its long-time ally Moscow. Podgorica was among the first to recognise Kosovo's independence in 2008, and in 2014 joined the EU's policy of sanctions against Russia over the Ukraine crisis. After three centuries of close friendship, Russian investment in Montenegro has markedly declined and Moscow has threatened consequences if it enters NATO. The Democratic Front, a pro-Russian opposition group, organised huge and occasionally violent anti-NATO protests late last year, calling for unrest if the government joined the alliance without holding a referendum on the issue. "If we win the October 2016 elections we will abolish sanctions against Russia and develop the closest economic and political ties (with Moscow)," Strahinja Bulajic, a leading Democratic Front official, told AFP. He said the sanctions were "one of the most shameful acts in national foreign policy". - Sceptical of NATO - Opinion polls show that while most of Montenegro's 620,000 people support EU membership, less than 40 percent are pro-NATO, with older people in particular leaning towards Russian ties. Many remain sceptical of NATO after its 1999 bombing campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, of which Montenegro was part. Pre-election surveys are not published but according to a confidential poll seen by AFP, Djukanovic's Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS) is set to get 40-43 percent of votes -- requiring the support of ethnic minority parties to form a government. The position of opposition groups in Montenegro is complicated: not all are pro-Russian, with some in favour of joining the EU but against being part of NATO. The Democratic Front, which is against both western alliances, is accused by the DPS of being illegally financed and supported by Russia. Among the other former Yugoslav republics, Croatia and Slovenia have both joined NATO, while many former communist states in eastern Europe have also become members -- something Russia sees as a threat to its security. "At these elections we will decide whether we lead Montenegro into the society of European nations or we take it backwards by at least 10 years," Djukanovic said during his campaign. - Russian investment falls - The premier's pro-Western policies have had economic consequences. Russia was once the leading foreign investor in Montenegro but in 2015 it cut its annual investment almost by half to just 68.9 million euros ($77.1 million). This fell to 22 million euros in the first six months of 2016, according to Montenegro's national bank. While this investment has dropped off, Russia has strengthened its influence in other ways in the region, for example through media -- the Kremlin-backed Sputnik agency set up a local-language portal from Belgrade last year. At a NATO summit in July, Djukanovic urged the EU to "implement a stronger regional strategy towards rival Russia... and provide greater, more visible diplomatic support to Balkan leaders". Opponents of the premier, who has ruled for more than 25 years, accuse him of authoritarianism, corruption and control over the electoral process using state apparatus.
Related Links Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |