|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
. | ![]() |
. |
|
![]() |
![]() by Staff Writers Tokyo (AFP) Jan 28, 2011
North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il was against a third-generation succession of power but named his youngest son as the next leader to ensure national stability, his eldest son told a Japanese newspaper. In a rare interview published Friday, Kim Jong-Nam, who has lived abroad for years after apparently falling out of favour with his father, also called on his half-brother, the heir apparent Kim Jong-Un, to improve North Koreans' lives. "Hereditary succession did not happen even under Chinese Chairman Mao Zedong," the 39-year-old told the Tokyo Shimbun in a 90-minute interview conducted earlier this month in southern China. "(Hereditary succession) does not fit socialism and my father was against it," he said in comments translated into Japanese. "I understand that it was done in order to stabilise the framework of the nation," he said. "Instability of North Korea will lead to instability of the surrounding region." Kim Jong-Il, 68, is seen as setting up the transfer of power to his third son Jong-Un, who is believed to be 27 and who accompanied his father on about one-fifth of his excursions last year. In September Jong-Un was made a four-star general and given senior posts in the ruling Workers' Party. Since then, he has been frequently listed or pictured accompanying his father. North Korea's leader, who is said to be in poor health, himself took over in the impoverished nation from his father and founding president Kim Il-Sung after his death in 1994, in the communist world's only family succession. Jong-Nam, who occasionally grants short interviews to Japanese press, reiterated that he had no interest in politics or succeeding to power in North Korea. He has previously told other Japanese media that he was personally opposed to a dynastic succession in North Korea. Jong-Nam said his "heart aches" when hearing about the harsh living conditions suffered by poverty-hit North Koreans. "I cannot believe people's lives are improving," he said. "The currency redenomination (in 2009) was a failure. North Korea should pay attention to reform and openness. If it continues like this, it cannot become an economic power. "What the North desires the most is the normalisation of ties with the US and settlement of peace on the Korean peninsula."
earlier related report The North proposed talks between legislators from North and South "to settle the grave situation prevailing" between the two nations. The two sides have already agreed in principle to hold military talks, in what would be their first contact since the North shelled a South Korean border island on November 23 -- killing four people including two civilians. Seoul also accuses its neighbour of torpedoing a warship last March with the loss of 46 lives, a charge the North denies. The long-stalled six-party nuclear forum groups the United States, Japan, the two Koreas, China and Russia. Pyongyang quit the talks in April 2009, a month before its second nuclear test, but has expressed conditional willingness to return. But Seoul, Washington and Tokyo say the North must first mend ties with the South and show it is serious about denuclearisation. Pyongyang's disclosure last November of a uranium enrichment plant -- which could be reconfigured to fuel nuclear weapons -- has lent fresh urgency to the disarmament efforts. Russia's nuclear negotiator Alexei Borodavkin indicated there had been some movement, in comments to his counterpart Wi Sung-Lac before their private talks in Seoul. "I think this period of time is really something, something is about to happen," Borodavkin said without explanation. "So we have to meet, consult and exchange views and try to coordinate our positions." US President Barack Obama and his Chinese counterpart Hu Jintao called at their summit last week for "necessary steps" to restart the dialogue soon. Prospects for an improvement in North-South ties remained unclear. Seoul has proposed holding working-level military talks on February 11 to set the time and agenda for high-level military dialogue. But it was unclear whether Pyongyang would accept Seoul's demands for "responsible measures" over last year's attacks and a pledge not to repeat them. Friday's call from the North's Democratic Front for the Reunification of the Fatherland, one of the bodies overseeing cross-border affairs, proposed unconditional talks. "We appeal to the South Korean authorities to discard useless misgivings and prejudice and honestly come out for all the proposed North-South dialogues without delay and any condition," it said in a statement on the official news agency. It said the danger of war "in which fire was returned for fire last year was defused temporarily thanks to the (North's) positive efforts but this danger still persists". The North says its shelling of the island near the disputed Yellow Sea border was in response to a South Korean artillery exercise, which dropped shells into waters claimed by Pyongyang. The South says its own exercise was routine and the North's response was a premeditated provocation. Its unification ministry responded coolly to the latest talks proposal, saying the offer appeared to lack sincerity. After months of fiery rhetoric, Pyongyang has changed tack this year and made frequent appeals for dialogue. Seoul has expressed scepticism about most of the overtures, saying they are public relations exercises.
Related Links Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
|
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement |