. | . |
Do or die? Study gives crash course in driverless ethics By Sara HUSSEIN Tokyo (AFP) Oct 24, 2018 In the not-too-distant future, driverless cars may have to choose between saving their passengers or pedestrians when faced with unavoidable accidents. But how should they decide? It's one of the thorniest issues faced by policymakers and manufacturers as we edge closer to a future where autonomous vehicles fill our roads, and a new study offers some potential principles based on a survey of millions of people. The researchers behind the study designed an online quiz with a variety of tough scenarios: should a car favour the lives of the young, or the old? Should it save the fit over the infirm? Is saving more lives always preferable to saving fewer? They wanted to see if people around the world would settle on some fundamental guidelines. "We identified three main principles on which people more or less agreed," said Jean-Francois Bonnefon, study co-author and a professor at the Toulouse School of Economics. They were: "protect human life (over animals), save the largest number of people, and place priority on saving children," he told AFP. "But even with these strong preferences there was variation from one country to another." The study, published Thursday in the journal Nature, found sometimes surprising differences among regions, including a "strong preference for sparing women and... fit characters" in France and French-influenced areas, as well as countries in Latin America. "But the fact that broad regions of the world displayed relative agreement suggests that our journey to consensual machine ethics is not doomed from the start," the study said. The quiz, dubbed the "Moral Machine", was put online in June 2016 in 10 languages, and the study is based on responses over an 18-month period. So far, more than two million people have taken the test, which remains online. Edmond Awad, a postdoctoral associate at MIT and first author of the study, said the data was intended to help guide policymakers. "Experts don't have to cater to the public's interests, especially when they find these preferences problematic," he told AFP. "But they should at least be aware of the potential reaction of the public when something goes wrong and their regulations are in place." The authors of the study acknowledged their decision to use an online quiz to reach the maximum number of participants meant their data set has some shortcomings. "Our sample is self-selected, and not guaranteed to exactly match the socio-demographics of each country," the authors wrote. "The fact that our samples are not guaranteed to be representative means that policymakers should not embrace our data as the final word on societal preferences." And it remains an open question whether government and regulators would be comfortable effectively enshrining a hierarchy of human life into law. To date, few governments have attempted to codify guidelines for driverless cars, but one example is a 2017 report by a German commission. It states explicitly that "any distinction based on personal features (age, gender, physical or mental constitution) is strictly prohibited."
Carbon fiber can store energy in the body of a vehicle Gothenburg, Sweden (SPX) Oct 19, 2018 A study led by Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, has shown that carbon fibres can work as battery electrodes, storing energy directly. This opens up new opportunities for structural batteries, where the carbon fibre becomes part of the energy system. The use of this type of multifunctional material can contribute to a significant weight-reduction in the aircraft and vehicles of the future - a key challenge for electrification. Passenger aircraft need to be much lighter than they are today ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |