|
. | . |
|
by Staff Writers Washington (AFP) Dec 06, 2014
US Vice President Joe Biden Saturday dismissed the "malarkey" about efforts to reach a nuclear deal with Iran, and reassured Israel its security would not be put at risk. "There's absolutely no daylight, none, between us and the Israelis on the question of Israel's security," Biden told the pro-Israel Saban forum in Washington. "But as friends we have an obligation to speak honestly with one another. To talk about, not avoid the tactical disagreements we have." Israel has publicly criticized US-led efforts to reach a deal to rein in Iran's suspect nuclear program, warning the administration of President Barack Obama is being fooled by the new, more moderate face of the Iranian leadership. Relations have also become strained over failed efforts to try to reach an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal, amid private mud-slinging by both American and Israeli officials. But Biden urged that such spats should not be allowed to overshadow relations. "Let's not make more of what are normal disagreements between friends than warrants," Biden said. And he insisted that "every aspect of" the Iran policy had been "discussed in detail" with Israel. "There's been a lot of malarkey about our position on Iran. So let me state it absolutely clearly," Biden said. "We will not let Iran acquire a nuclear weapon, period, period. End of discussion. It will not happen on our watch." The global powers known as the P5+1 who are leading the efforts to stop Iran developing a nuclear weapon have extended their talks until June 30, after they failed to meet a November deadline for a deal. "A diplomatic solution that puts significant and verifiable constraints on Iran's nuclear program represents the best and most sustainable chance to ensure that America, Israel, the entire Middle East will never be menaced by a nuclear-armed Iran," Biden insisted. And he urged "please let's keep whatever disagreements we have in perspective, because... they don't go to the essence of who we are as Americans and who Israelis are."
Israel played key role to stop 'bad' Iran nuclear deal: PM The deal would have "effectively left Iran as a threshold nuclear power," he told a Washington think-tank in a recorded speech. "Even though Israel isn't part of the P5+1 our voice and our concerns played a critical role in preventing a bad deal." The global powers known as the P5+1 who are leading efforts to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon have extended their talks until June 30, after they failed to meet the November 24 deadline for a deal. Calling it the most "vital national security challenge we face," Israel and its allies "must use the time available to increase the pressure on Iran to dismantle is nuclear weapons capability," Netanyahu said. Israel has publicly criticized US-led efforts to reach a deal to rein in Iran's suspect nuclear program, under which the Islamic republic would freeze much of its uranium enrichment program in return for sanctions relief. Israeli officials have repeatedly warned that the administration of President Barack Obama is being fooled by the new, more moderate face of the Iranian leadership. They say Iran will pay lip-service to any deal, pocketing billions in much needed cash-reserves while covertly still trying to develop an atomic bomb. But addressing the Saban forum after the Israeli prime minister, US Secretary of State John Kerry insisted once again that the US administration would not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear bomb. "While we may disagree on tactics from time to time, when it comes to the core strategic goal -- no nuclear weapon -- there is not an inch of daylight between the United States and Israel," Kerry said. Iran has denied that it has been trying to develop an atomic weapon under the guise of its civilian nuclear energy program. But Kerry reiterated that "systematically over many years Iran did not address the world's concerns about an illicit nuclear program." He said a "verified, negotiated agreement" was the best way to "resolve the international community's legitimate concerns" as well as proving that Iran's "nuclear program is peaceful." Despite the extended deadline, Kerry insisted the hope was now to wrap up the negotiations within the next three to four months. "We have no intention of negotiating forever. And absent measurable progress, who knows how much longer this could go on," Kerry said. The Obama administration is seeking to persuade Congress from adopting new sanctions against Iran in this interim period, arguing that it could scupper the entire delicate negotiating process. "In recent weeks, we have seen new ideas surface, flexibility emerge, that could, I repeat could help resolve some issues, that had been intractable," Kerry said.
Related Links Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |