 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
|
SPACE SCIENCE
Goldilocks and ET
So far, searches for ET have come up empty-handed. No signals have been detected. But an Australian astronomer Dr Charles Lineweaver has come up with a new way to tell us something about extra-terrestrials. By cleverly combining observations of extra-solar planets and the rate of star formation in the Universe, he has found that our Earth is much younger than other Earth-like planets in the Universe. In a paper recently submitted to Icarus, the leading journal of planetary science, Dr Lineweaver reported that "three quarters of the Earth-like planets in the Universe are older than the Earth and their average age is 1.8 (plus or minus 0.9) billion years older than the Earth". Dr Lineweaver outlined his argument as follows: "Immediately after the Big Bang, 13 billion years ago, the Universe was made of hydrogen and helium. There was no carbon, oxygen, iron or silicon. Therefore no Earth-like planets could form around the first stars. "Then, in a strong burst of star formation that lasted a few billion years, these ingredients were produced in abundance by stars. This meant the formation of Earth-like planets became possible. "But there is a catch. Too much of these ingredients seems to be a bad thing for Earth formation. The 50 or so huge extra-solar planets detected so far are found preferentially around stars rich in these ingredients. And these huge planets are in orbits that would destroy any Earth-like planets. "You can think of this as a 'Goldilocks effect': with a shortage of ingredients Earths were unable to form, with too much, giant planets would destroy any Earths trying to form. As Goldilocks insisted, the porridge had to be 'just right' or there was no deal." Although his analysis is about terrestrial planets, not life on them, Dr Lineweaver concluded that if life formed as readily on other Earth-like planets as it did on Earth some 3.5 billion years ago -- then this gives us an age distribution for life on such planets and a rare clue about how we compare with other life that might inhabit the Universe. "The 'rare clue' is this: most of the life forms in the Universe have had two billion years longer to evolve than we have. To put this time span in perspective, two billion years ago our ancestors were microscopic single-celled amoebas," he said. Related Links An Estimate of the Age Distribution of Terrestrial Planets SpaceDaily Search SpaceDaily Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express 
SPACE SCIENCE
Are Life's Diamonds That Rare Cameron Park - July 27, 1999Belief in the rarity of the Earth as an abode for life keeps swinging back and forth. After the triumph of Copernicus' belief that the Earth was not the center of the universe, the general feeling among scientists was that inhabited worlds were common.
|
|
| |||||||||
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |
